Although Schrader has incorporated elements of the transcendental style in several of his past films, First Reformed is his first project that fully embraces the form. As such, the film feels like the culmination of the thematic and aesthetic preoccupations Schrader has been developing throughout his career; it clearly stands as Schrader’s most accomplished treatise on alienation, the place of the protestant faith in the contemporary world, and spiritual yearning. It is a pointedly ascetic work, constructed around a series of strict aesthetic principles: no non-diegetic music; a muted colour palette dominated by wintery whites and grays; a 1.33 aspect ratio; minimal camera movement; planometric compositions dominate. Schrader has always worn his cinematic influences on his sleeve, yet his work has, for the most part, avoided registering as simply a compendium of reference points. The power of First Reformed is rooted in Schrader’s ability to take a number of clear forbearers — Bresson, Dreyer, Maurice Pialat — and twist them into a style that feels wholly unique and rooted in a personal set of values and obsessions.
Toller is — to borrow a phrase from Schrader’s Taxi Driver — a man of contradictions, caught between passive contemplation and socio-political outrage. He lives a self-consciously minimalist and disciplined lifestyle, retreating each night to a stripped-back rectory to write a record of his thoughts in a journal. He shuns materialist pleasures and 21st century technologies, steadfastly refusing to modernize his church despite his dwindling congregation. The fact that this self-imposed austerity could be perceived as either heroic devotion or prideful self-indulgence is not lost on Toller: “When I read these words I see not truth but pride”, he writes. “Did Jesus worry about being liked?” As much as he longs to reach the spiritual purity of a saint, Toller cannot escape his petty egoism, and his awareness of this irony results in extreme self-hatred. As Schrader explained in a recent interview: “It all starts with the blood. Everybody sacrifices: there are the symbolic bloody sacrifices of the son, the symbolic drinking of the blood for communion. And so Christians often go off in this way. They’re connecting their suffering to Christ’s suffering. They’re suffering their way into heaven, and they can therefore redeem themselves”. Toller masochistically commits himself to absolute abstinence, perceiving it as a heroic display of moral fiber that will bring about his spiritual absolution. In doing so, Toller increasingly sheds his previous conviction and is drawn towards Michael’s extremist ideology — as he is tasked with presiding over the man’s funeral and sorting through his belongings, Toller finds himself plagued by the same sense of ecological dread. If Toller previously considered it his position to stand as a solid beacon of hope in the face of the overwhelming forces of despair that are consuming his parishioners, the primary question that comes to plague him is whether inaction in the face of widespread injustice is itself sinful. Is it more justifiable for Toller to take on the role of the passivist or the activist? In direct opposition to the idealistic, self-doubting Toller is Joel Jeffers, the pragmatic, complacent leader of Abundant Life, who runs his church with the simple-minded gusto of a self-help guru and finds more value in dealing with monetary concerns than tackling complex theological conundrums. As Toller increasingly believes, the natural world must be perceived as a manifestation of God and the Church’s refusal to directly engage the fight against its despoliation by industry is a betrayal of the holy doctrine. Joel, in contrast, believes that the Church should play a more abstract role in the spiritual guidance of its followers and remain removed from socio-political matters. To rub salt into the wound, Joel accepts a substantial donation by a local industrialist whose company is responsible for a large portion of the area’s water pollution.
Schrader had a strict upbringing in the Calvinist faith, and First Reformed feels like an attempt to come to terms with his own conflicted feelings towards his background. The Calvinists were notable for their steadfast rejection of the visual decadence which had overtaken the Catholic church, as they longed to rid themselves of the distraction of visual splendour and re-focus their flock onto the sacred doctrines. This austerity is reflected not only in the habits of Toller — a nostalgist who wards off the pervasive influence of the materialist Abundant Life — but in the stripped-back formal severity of the film itself.
The ending of First Reformed has often been compared to that of the Schrader-scripted Taxi Driver, in which a dream-like coda suggests that its lead character has either been hailed as a hero by society after his psychotic actions or he has lost his mind completely within the confines of a jail cell, retreating entirely into grandiose delusions. In the earlier film, however, this ambiguity is cynical whichever way you look at it: Travis Bickle is a despicable character, one who only indulges in grandiose fantasies as a way to self-justify his intense alienation, misogyny and bitterness. If Bickle was lionized by the New York press, it would not point to the protagonist’s redemption but rather reveal further the rottenness of the city that breeds men like him. In contrast, Toller is a far more admirable — though imperfect — figure, and the ending of First Reformed is an act of empathy in his favour. Schrader has spoken openly about the ambiguity of his ending: “It’s calibrated to be read in different ways, because when you look at it closely, she suddenly appears, the room is much lighter, the footsteps go away — so [I was] trying to find the right balance between it being a kind of intervention of grace, a kind of miracle, or an ecstatic vision, which is also a kind of miracle, I guess.” What is clear, then, is that either interpretation is deeply optimistic. If we are to believe the former, Mary has appeared miraculously to deliver Toller a respite from his torment, thus sparing his life. If we are to believe the latter, Toller has finally shed the shackles of the physical world and has found a degree of peace in the next world, as if God, who has long tormented Toller with his absence, now embraces his disciple with open arms. Toller’s redemption is certain, whether this takes an earthly form or a more abstract, metaphysical one.
James Slaymaker (@jmslaymaker) is a filmmaker from Dorset, UK and a PhD student at The University of Southampton. His writing has been featured in MUBI Notebook, Senses of Cinema, Film International, Little White Lies, Sound on Sight, Popmatters, Alternate Takes, Bright Lights Film Journal, College Humour, The Vulgar Cinema and McSweeney’s, among others. He’s also contributed a chapter to the upcoming book ‘Hard to Get: The Films and Female Characters of Howard Hawks.’ His first book, ‘Time is Luck: The Life and Cinema of Michael Mann,’ is due for publication in 2018.
Categories: 2018 Film Essays, Featured, Film Essays

1 reply »